What kind of books have you guys been reading lately?

finished the first part (out of six) of Crime & Punishment and so far has been an interesting read. reading about the murder being done and described in detail was pretty hype lol. im interested in the psychological stuff itll get into later on.
as for past books, i enjoyed reading Hamlet, The Sorrows of Young Werther and The Book of Disquiet. would like to check out House of Leaves in summer
I completely forgot about this thread 😭
Anyways I finished reading Crime & Punishment more than 3 months ago and I'm pretty sure I remember what I thought of it after finishing.

For the most part, it was alright. Didn't really blow my mind or anything just a decent read. Pacing was pretty good but every now and then there would be a block of text that didn't add anything to the story.
It has topics like "capitalism bad" and tbh books with those topics often leave a bad taste in my mouth or end up sorta boring by bringing up the same points all of them bring up. I was more interested in the characters, who were for the most part alright, but they were either very barebones or very complex and rarely in-between.
Character deaths in the book are done really well, the worldbuilding was mediocre, characters were pretty good (although I do wish some of them weren't barebones) and it's written very well.

In short, it's a decent book with pretty interesting psychological themes and character interactions. Not worth a whopping 500 pages though.
 
been plonking through the discworld series in chronological order of release while at work and just finished mort. i like these funny wizards i think i shall read more of them
 
i'd actually been meaning to read Ring for a minute, but then i got 8 books deep into Malazan (10 counting the side novels), started The First Law trilogy by joe abercrombie and threw in some warhammer slop novels and it got lost in the shuffle. i'll get around to it at some point.

right now i'm reading Valkia the Bloody by Sarah Cawkwell, some of the aforementioned warhammer slop. i generally use the term endearingly, and there are a handful of Black Library novels that I would consider to be Worth Reading, but this one is to be taken literally. despite being about one of my favourite WHFB characters, it's unfortunately a big ol flop. every single character is almost entirely unlikeable, but not in a cool "well the book's about a villainous character so of course they suck" way. it's uninteresting, kind of a slog despite being a brief read, and tells you nothing about her character that isn't told better in the actual Army Books for the tabletop game. similar to the Horus Heresy novels, it turns out knowing exactly what happened leading up to the event is a lot less interesting than speculating. i'm going to finish it anyway since i may as well, but it's definitely not one i would recommend
 
Slowly going thru the audiobook of The Crying of Lot 49 by Thomas Pynchon and I keep on having to rewind it because he has a way of writing in which so much is said with so little words . It's genuinely insane how much detail can be stuffed within the sentences he constructs I've never seen anything like it .
 
Finished Ring a while ago, but I like to let books and movies sit with me for a bit before I try to put thoughts to them. It does get a bit weird, and it's almost nothing like the movies at all. A considerable amount of stuff is different, I heard there was a straight-to-TV movie released in '95 that more accurately follows the book. Might have to give it a watch.

Some of the things that they changed weren't all bad though. Asakawa is a guy with a wife and one year old daughter, Ryuji is his best friend, and also
a self-proclaimed rapist. This is mentioned a surprising number of times.
Ryuji also is the only one of the two that actively make the story go forward majority of the time, which I get. That's how their personalities are written. Asakawa is a coward. However, you're reading it and Ryuji is being smart about handling everything, then you either
get hit with the fact that he's raped women or you remember it on your own. There's even a scene where he's recalling his first assault, but it stops right before anything actually happens. Which is weird, cause at the end his assistant says he died a virgin.

(Assume future spoilers also contain sexual content.)

I think I enjoy the book version of Sadako more than the films. The films lean into the idea that she calls people after they watch the tape, but that doesn't happen in the book. At least, not this one. I also really like that Sadako was intersex. I found that out before reading and wanted to check out how it was done in the books. She was also raped, then killed because of it. I wanted to research how that was handled so I could better discuss such matters in my own works tastefully and in a succinct way. I'll go in length about this more when I make my own thread about my projects later.

Sadako's cursed tape being a result of her innate psychic power, her sexual assault/hate crime, and contracting smallpox to form an almost STD/virus-esque method of reproduction was genius. I'm glad they kept that baseline idea in the movies. I can say, wholeheartedly, that I actually want a more faithful recreation of the book into a modern movie. The franchise is due for a reboot anyway, it kinda got away from itself with Sadako Vs. Kayako.

Some people say the flow of the book is a bit all over the place, but I didn't seem to mind it or notice. If you like weird shit and can handle overt sexual content/theming, then you'd likely enjoy the book as well. I've been a fan of the franchise for a long time; Sadako is one of my favorite horror antagonists. The book has made me appreciate that even more. Definitely going to read the sequels.
 
I got back into reading recently and have gone through a couple of decent books I've been meaning to read for forever!

Neuromancer by William Gibson was a fantastic ride as someone who is absolutely in love with the cyberpunk genre, and reading what is basically one of the touchstones of the genre was a great experience. You really feel the grit and grime from the setting and the emotional conflicts of the characters.
I followed that up with Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson and that was such a fun time. With the main character literally being named 'Hiro Protagonist', it's almost tongue-in-cheek the whole way through, but leaves a lot of space for the characters to shine. It does a fantastic job and establishing the metaverse and the woes of being caught in the corporate hellscape of a neo future world.

Def going to give a couple of the books mentioned here a shot as well, so many seem really cool!
 
i actually started reading house of leaves in late december last year! it's been really great so far, just over a third through it now.
i've actually been wanting to read it for years, and considering how i've been trying to "de-rot" my brain of phones/algorithms recently, i thought picking a notoriously "difficult" (?) book to read would be a good start haha. i am looking for what to read next, football 17776 will probably be next but idk how well i'll go, i just have difficulty reading text on screens.
 
Finished Solaris by Stanisław Lem earlier this week, after like 5 years of procrastinating on it. I’m not the biggest sci-fi guy, I picked it up without any prior knowledge, and it was an amazing ride. I don’t want to spoil much, but this relatively short read is so densely packed with stuff; it’s a cosmic horror, but instead of being unexplainable, it’s overexplained to the point where it feels absolutely naive and bizarre, which doesn’t help at all. It has that fine psychedelic sci-fi atmosphere, and plot-wise, it’s extremely captivating. This story progresses very linearly, written from the first-person perspective, and because of that, I would KILL for a good movie adaptation. And for me, it has this obscure early 2000s 2D quest videogame vibe to it, which I adore.

For the seekers of deep knowledge, this book has it all: a look at our anthropocentrism, solid reflection about our possible alien contact, and wild, wild takes on theology.

If you are interested in futurology stuff, liked Outer WIlds, All Tomorrows or Serial Experiments Lain - please give it a try, you will like it!!!

"We are humanitarian and chivalrous; we don't want to enslave other races, we simply want to bequeath them our values and take over their heritage in exchange. We think of ourselves as the Knights of the Holy Contact. This is another lie. We are only seeking Man. We have no need of other worlds. We need mirrors."
"I'm not thinking of a god whose imperfection arises out of the candour of his human creators, but one whose imperfection represents his essential characteristic: a god limited in his omniscience and power, fallible, incapable of forseeing the consequences of his acts, and creating things that lead to horror. He is a... sick god, whose ambitions exceed his powers and who does not realize it at first. A god who has created clocks, but not the time they measure. He has created systems and mechanisms that served specific ends but have now overstepped and betrayed them. And he has created eternity, which was to have measured his power, and which measures his unending defeat."
FldsV0.jpg
 
Haven't heard of this before but anything that allows you to namedrop Outer Wilds, All Tomorrows and Lain has instantly got my attention. Wishlisted
 
rsz_1bladeitselfthe_abercrombie.webp

TLDR
finished this last week. i thought it was pretty good, but for about half of the book i was wondering why so many of my friends were telling me it was great. has pretty good ratings on goodreads too (though that really isn't indicative of quality anyway) so i was maybe expecting it to start off with the good stuff, but it's definitely more of a slow burn, character driven story than I was led to believe. by the end I was really into it, and I think it does what a good "first act" should: make you want to pick up the second book immediately, which is exactly what I did. so before I go into more detail I would say I recommend it if you already enjoy fantasy as a genre, but I'm not sure it would change your mind at all if you don't. you should read Malazan for that, but I digress.


The Full Review
at first glance, it's pretty standard stuff. you've got the Union, the centralized major power with its glorious cities and regimented armies, political intrigue and lords jockeying for position and wealth. you've got the North, which is a hodgepodge of every "Northern" fantasy trope you've ever read. more warlike, definitely Not Vikings, some of whom can speak to spirits of the land. you don't die in the North, you "return to the mud". stand out enough, do something noteworthy and you become a Named Man. if you've read something that has "weirdos in the north", that's them. to the south there's Gurkhul, which aren't quite as detailed as the other two in this book, but they also seem pretty standard. desert region, a little bit of Essos from ASOIAF or Genabackis from Malazan. this book sets them up mostly through the perspective of two characters, an escaped slave named Ferro and a Union Inquisitor named Glokta. neither of which have particularly good things to say about them. I imagine I'll learn a lot more about them in the second book, but in this one they're more of a narrative device than a real fleshed out faction. they were at war with the Union a while back and lost, so tensions are still pretty high.
the Overall story is that shit is going bad for the Union, with the North mobilizing for war under a new leader who is suspiciously organized and REALLY good at this, and the Gurkish to the south who'll have no trouble steamrolling the Union if they reorganize their armies to deal with the Northmen, leaving their southern cities exposed. all in all, this seems pretty standard, right? i agree with you, which is why I said I was wondering why this was so highly recommended for about half the book.

it's not as concerned with maps and huge family lineages as something like ASOIAF or Malazan. it's closer to the Witcher in terms of its worldbuilding, in that it's There but not really the point, so it doesn't need to be detailed all the way down to the minutiae. what Abercrombie excels at is putting VERY GOOD characters in these otherwise pretty normal fantasy scenarios, and they're why I stuck with it and ended up really excited to get onto the next one. because it's SO character driven, getting really into each of them in detail is more spoiler-y than telling you what's going on between the three nations, so I won't talk about too much. but main POVs are roughly divided into a couple camps, so I'll do a quick overview and if any of these characters sound in the least bit interesting to you, then I think you should give The Blade Itself a chance.

The Union
Jezal dan Luthar: A real highborn piece of shit who I love dearly. He deserves everything because he's from a good bloodline! He truly believes himself to be better than every single person he sees, and watching a lot of this start to unravel when he falls in love with a commoner is a great time. In stark contrast to that dogshit Valkia novel I talked about, this is a great example of a character who Fucking Sucks but is compelling. You almost want to see him succeed, and he always does something that pisses you off just enough that you take it back momentarily. He rocks.

Sand dan Glokta: Union Inquisitor. A 35 year old man with the body of one who's 90, after spending years enduring torture in a Gurkish prison. Toothless, hobbled, pretty much every movement causes him Fucking Agony and the book lets you know constantly. Prior to this, he was a great hero of the Union. Bold, handsome, impeccable with a blade and winner of tourneys. Now in the Inquisition, he mostly relies on his sharp mind to root out corruption and conspiracy. His chapters are where most of the intrigue happens, and his inner monologue as he susses out crime or deduces someone's motivations are a great read.

Collem West: Hero of the common man. A man who rose up in the ranks not through bloodline but sheer merit. The more grounded POV entwined with Jezal's, a lot of it is West going around trying to Get Shit Together because THE FUCKING NORTH IS COMING but the STUPID FUCKING NOBLES are too busy playing grabass to deal with it, and won't listen to his advice because he's just a lowborn. Who cares what he has to say? A deceptively deep character, one of his chapters actually pissed me off so bad I had to walk it off. In a good way, of course, but a tough chapter nonetheless.

The North
Logen Ninefingers: It's a little hard to talk about Logen without giving too much away, since he's the character I think flourishes the most as the story goes on. An extremely skilled fighter and "Named Man" from the North who is separated from the rest of his group as soon as the book starts. At odds with the current leader of the North, his POV takes him on a journey to the Union where it becomes more of a fish out of water story for a time. It turns out they aren't all that accepting of a Big Scarred Fucker pulling up as soon as war breaks out, despite him being kind of a gentle giant. A man supremely skilled in acts of horrific violence, but he'd really rather not, people just keep forcing his hand. His interactions with Luthar and Glokta are some of my favourites in the entire book.

The Dogman: Named Man and member of Logen's group, before they're separated. Dogman's the POV here but his chapters deal with the whole group and situation in the North. Logen's boys are Wanted since they disagree with the North's current leadership, so their chapters are kind of band of brothers-y or maybe even kind of The Warriors. Gritty survival stories as they try to make it through a region that wants nothing to do with them anymore, each member having a specific role. Dogman's our tracker/survivalist/voice of reason here so he gets POV privilege, but they're all pretty fleshed out and the insight on how things work in the North is fun & much needed. despite Dogman being the POV, I think my actual favourite characters in the group are Black Dow and Rudd Threetrees. these are My Boys and I think maybe my favourite chapters pound for pound.

The Secret Third Option
Ferro Maljinn: An escaped slave. A more minor POV, her chapters don't really tell you TOO much about the Gurkish like Dogman's do the Northmen, but they really get across just how much she hates them. Every Ferro chapter is a tense, coiled spring ready to explode into acts of terrible violence against her oppressors. If Logen's our Barbarian, Ferro's our Rogue. A weapon hidden in every nook, her fights are scrappy, tooth & nail affairs that really drive home her desperation and sheer bitter will to survive. Another character who flourishes later, as her chapters get closer to the other characters. I'm really stoked to see how she carries on in the second book.


A lotta words for a book I wasn't really sold on for a while. The Blade Itself is definitely a setup book, so going into it knowing as such probably makes the slow burn a little more digestible. As far as his actual prose goes, Abercrombie's fine. Doesn't get too flowery nor too modern, I don't really have a lot of notes. It's an easy read, and the frequent POV changes aren't hard to follow at all. Book's good!
 
Back
Top